標題: Judgment of the Supreme [打印本頁] 作者: Afrinrubi 時間: 2023-10-14 17:24 標題: Judgment of the Supreme Concept of a document has a very broad scope, and criminal law protection covers documents recorded not only on a paper medium, but also on any information medium, as long as the content contained therein constitutes evidence as to one of the circumstances indicated in provisions of art. § of the Penal Code, for this reason a SIM card confirming the right to use telecommunications services is considered a document cf. J. Błachut, Document as an object of criminal law protection, Warsaw.
Forging a document A document is counterfeited when it is prepared by an unauthorized person while maintaining the appearance of originating from the alleged issuer of the document cf. judgment of the Supreme phone number list Court of October , , ref. no. act III KK . Moreover, the concept of "counterfeiting" provided for in Art. § of the Penal Code, the perpetrator's behavior is also responsible for adding, by technical means, to a sheet of paper signed in blank, content of legal significance inconsistent with.
The will and intention of the signer, e.g. by unauthorized taking possession of cards signed in blank, and then providing them with a computer print. In this way, the perpetrator creates the appearance that the document comes from a specific issuer, using his real signature cf. Court of February , , ref. no. act V KK . For the assignment of a crime under Art. § of the Penal Code involving the forgery of a document, it should be demonstrated that the document is forged only when the document does not come from the person on whose behalf it was prepared, i.e. when it is created by a person not authorized to issue it.
